I don't know how I missed this book as a student in high school and college, but I did. I think we read Great Expectations and of course, everyone knows A Christmas Carol by Charles Dickens. Whether we have read A Tale Of Two Cities or not we have all probably heard the opeing sentence and the closing sentence without knowing where they came from.
The book opens with the sentence "It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epock of belief, it was the epock of incredulity, it was the season of Light, it was the season of Darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair, we had everything before us, we had nothing before us, we were all going direct to Heaven, we were all going direct the other way - in short, the period was so far like the present period, that some of its noisiest authorities insisted on its being received, for good or for evil, in the superlative degree of comparison only."
Wow! Dickens is referring to the French revolution when La Guillotine was lopping off 60 heads a day, day after day after day.
"A Tale of Two Cities" begins in 1775, with Mr. Lorry, a respectable London banker, meeting Lucie Manette in Paris, where they recover Lucie's father, a doctor, and mentally enfeebled by an unjust and prolonged imprisonment in the Bastille. This assemblage, on their journey back to England, meets Charles Darnay, an immigrant to England from France who makes frequent trips between London and Paris. Upon their return to England, Darnay finds himself on trial for spying for France and in league with American revolutionaries. His attorney, Stryver, and Stryver's obviously intelligent, if morally corrupt and debauched, assistant, Sydney Carton, manage to get Darnay exonerated of the charges against him. Darnay, a self-exiled former French aristocrat, finds himself compelled to return to France in the wake of the French Revolution, drawing all those around him into a dangerous scene.
Dickens portrays the French Revolution simplistically, but powerfully, as a case of downtrodden peasants exacting a harsh revenge against an uncaring aristocratic, even feudal, system. The Defarge's, a wine merchant and his wife, represent the interests of the lower classes, clouded by hatred after generations of misuse. Darnay, affiliated by birth with the French aristocracy, is torn between sympathy for his native country in its suffering, and his desire to be free of his past."
The book ends with the sentence "It's a far, far better thing that I do, than I have ever done; it is a far, far better rest that I go to than I have ever known."
The creative tension is this novel is developed from several factors but primarily it's from the good intentions gone bad. How does a revolution against oppression and subjugation turn into another form of oppression and subjugation? How does debauchery and irresponsibility turn into heroism and great courage? How does atruistic and high minded intentions get misconstrued as treachery and betrayal?
I loved this book, and I see why it has survived almost 200 years as literature. I highly recommend it.
Amazon.com: Books: A Tale of Two Cities