Corporate "mindshare" coming to a school bus for your kids?

Jonathan Rowe has an interesting article on his blog on 06/15/06 regarding the playing of commercials on school buses in Massachusettes. This is another example of the corporate take over of the commons for commerical purposes. Kids are a captive audience being compelled by the state to attend school even against their will and then subjected to corporate messages to manipulate their developing minds and identities.

Here is part of what Jonathan says in his article:

Corporations seek to dominate space. First it was physical space, and now it is mental space – what is called, in marketing argot, “mindshare.” The political Right seeks to cut taxes to shrink the public sphere, or “starve the beast” in Grover Norquist’s phrase. Put the two together and what do you get? You get corporations laying claim to common space, and to the minds of those who occupy it.

The latest example is BusRadio, a company in Massachusetts that is going to install special radio receivers in school buses, so it can fill the airspace in them with ads aimed at kids. School districts starved for funds will get a cut of the ad revenues. BusRadio will get a captive audience of impressionable kids that it can sell to corporate advertisers eager to get inside their minds. The compulsory school laws will become the means to corral these captive kids and deliver them to the sponsors.

If this does become a reality, it might be a reason for thinking parents to homeschool their kids to protect them from the corporate "mindshare".

Link: OnTheCommons.org | A Captive Audience of Kids.


Depression in kids may precede or follow bullying

Reuters reported on May 4, 2006 on a study in the May,2006 issue of Pediatrics on the relationship between depression and being bullied. The study, done in the Netherlands, on over 1,100 students in 18 elementary schools between the ages of 9 and 11, found that there is a high association between depression, being bullied, and other health symptoms. The Reuters article says in part:

"Anxiety and depression may make a child appear more vulnerable and less capable of defending him (or) herself," Fekkes explained. "Anxious or depressed children may therefore be an easier target for bullies," the researcher added.

In light of the findings, parents should consider the possibility that their child is being bullied if he or she develops health problems, such as depression, abdominal pain, sleep problems or anxiety, Fekkes told Reuters Health, adding that "many children do not tell their parents that they are being bullied."

"In addition," Fekkes continued, "parents of depressed or anxious children may consider seeking help for their children from a counselor or school psychologist to improve their social skills, which may prevent victimization.

When I see these depressed kids in my office often pediatricians, parents, and even the kids themselves are not aware of the relationship between the manifestation of symptoms and the kids interpersonal relationships at school. I have found that once kids are empowered to stand up for themselves that the symptoms seem to improve. This usually takes 3 - 4 sessions.

It is interesting these days how the pharmaceutical industry has pushed our society to look for biochemical imbalances in the brain as explanations for the problems we observe rather than the social environment that often contains factors contributing to symtoms which, if addressed, would minimize or eliminate those symptoms in cheaper, more effective, and more relevant ways.

Link: MedlinePlus: Depression in kids may precede or follow bullying.


Kewl health web site for kids - BAM - Body and Mind

The Center for Disease Control and Prevention has a great web site for kids 9 - 13 on health related topics which is interactive. (I think adults might find it interesting and fun as well.)

Click on the link below and explore. If you have a child, point them to this web site and ask them to check it out.

Link: BAM! Body and Mind | www.bam.gov | Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


Class and American Families

On March 23, 2006, WBUR On Point with Tom Ashbrook had a great show on "Class and American Families". Here is the brief description of the topic discussed:

Sociologist Annette Lareau spent years parked in the middle of the intimate family lives of American families -- upper middle class, working class, and poor. Treat me "like the family dog" she told them, as she watched, up close, how these families raised their children.

What she found were large and consequential class distinctions in styles of child rearing. Entitled middle class kids were scheduled to the max and taught to question authority. Free and easy-going poor and working class kids were taught to love their families - and obey. Each made sense, but the advantages flowing to the more affluent style, she says, are huge.

I have often thought that what we call race in the U.S. is really a disguised discussion for class, something which most Americans are embarassed and ashamed to discuss.

Are there differences in values, beliefs, and behavior between upper, middle, working, and lower classes in the United States? Yes! and they are huge. Do these class differences have prognostic value for life projectory of children? Are you kidding? HUGE!

If you are interested in learning more, you can download the one hour long program from the WBUR web site. It is well worth listening to.

Link: On Point : Class and American Families - Class and American Families.


Don't let schooling interfere with your child's education. Bush's lie of No Child Left Behind

WBUR's radio show, On Point, featured "Education and No Child Left Behind" on March 29, 2006. Here is the show description on the web site.

A big new report out this week says that thousands of American schools have found one way to try to raise reading and math scores: cut back on teaching everything else. President Bush's "No Child Left Behind" program punishes schools that don't hit their marks on reading and math test scores.

Now, in a remarkable display of perhaps unintended consequences, a national survey finds 71 percent of schools squeezing out the rest. Science, social studies, history, music, art -- all pushed to the margins. In some schools, it's reading in the morning, and math in the afternoon. Period.

Hear about the narrowing of the curriculum of American education to reading, writing -- and testing.

It is interesting how many schools are now "teaching to the test" and have bi-passed their students education. Schools are focused at least five hours per day on making kids "decode" and "calculate" so they can pass a state mandated test. If the little monkey's can be trained to perform to standard on these tasks, the state considers them "not left behind". It's a brave new world.

My wife and I finally decided to homeschool our children in the mid 80s after we got fed up with the nonsense that goes on in schools. The homeschooling slogan of the day was "Don't let schooling interfere with your education."

Americans spend billions and billions of dollars on schooling, and the concern is that lower socioeconomic students are not getting the program. As Tom Ashbrook, the host of On Point, asks repeatedly "Does whipping the horse harder make it go faster?"

It seems ridiculous to think that more of the same in the long run will produce better results. "Buckling down" as it is called, means that schools focus exclusively on math and science and ignore science, social studies, art, music, literature, and other topics. In many instances "buckling down" seems to demoralize teachers and students even if students are finally able to produce the mediocre results that allow them to pass minimal state standards. Having extinguished their spirit, by golly, maybe the little critters can perform their tricks for the government task masters.

Thomas Sobol, former Commissioner of Education in New York State, and now Professor of Education at Columbia Univerity, spouts the tired old line that if only we spent more money, and teachers were better educated, then things would improve. This is utter nonsense and not something I would expect an educated man to say.

In a healthy environment, kids are natural leaners. I know, I taught my kids at home. I saw them learn, and learn well, and with joy, curiosity, and creativity. To send them to school would kill their spirit. I wanted my kids to get an education, a complete and whole education, of their mind, character, and spirit, something they were not getting in a public school.

Ever wonder why schooling is compulsory in a free democracy?

Some educational psychologists have considered public schooling a form of child abuse. In some circumstances, I tend to agree. Schools have become armed fortresses with their metal detectors and cop monitors in hallways. Powerful cliques that bully kids if they are not dressed right, or act right, have life lasting negative effects on kids. Coming of age movies like Mean Girls, Saved, Heathers, Carrie, Empire Falls, etc. are just a few which graphically depict the psychological damage done to kids in the modern industrialized public school.

To listen to this disturbing show, click on the link below.

Link: On Point : Education and No Child Left Behind - Education and No Child Left Behind.


Students with drug convictions sue U.S. Department of Education Over Financial Aid Denials

Join Together Online reported on March 24, 2006 on an article which appeared in the New York Times on March 22, 2006 describing a lawsuit being brought by the ACLU and Students For a Sensible Drug Policy against the U. S. Department of Education for cutting their student loans because of past drug convictions.

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Students for Sensible Drug Policy (SSDP) are suing the U.S. Department of Education for denying financial aid to students with a past history of drug offenses, the New York Times reported March 22.

Named as plaintiffs in the class-action suit, filed in federal court in South Dakota, are three students who lost their financial aid after disclosing past drug convictions. Because of the law, an estimated 200,000 students with drug records have lost federal aid since 1998.

The ACLU and SSDP claim that the law represents unconstitutional double jeopardy, violates due process, and disproportionately affects African-Americans.

Kraig Selken, one of the three plaintiffs in the case, said poor students also bear the brunt of the law. "If I had richer parents or better economic status, I wouldn't even have to worry about it, because I could simply pay my way to any school I wanted," he said.

Link: Students, ACLU Sue Over Financial Aid Denials.


Billions of dollars wasted in Iraq. What about the poor kids in America? Why are they failing in school?

Who are the kids that are at risk for school failure and consequently at risk for problems in adolescence and adulthood?

One of the biggest risk factors identified by the RAND corporation in their report "Children at Risk: Consequences for School Readiness and Beyond" is poverty.

Here are some facts about childhood poverty mentioned on the RAND web site,

Poverty has been shown to be particularly detrimental in early childhood in terms of children’s subsequent educational and other life course outcomes. In 2003, 4.7 million children under age 6 lived in families with income below the poverty line (defined as $18,660 for a family of four or $14,824 for a family of three, each with two children). While the poverty rate is 20 percent overall for children under 6, the rate is 53 percent among children that age living in a female-headed household, 39 percent for African-American children, and 32 percent for Latino children.

Link: RAND Research Brief | Children at Risk: Consequences for School Readiness and Beyond.


Autherine Lucy threatened with death 50 years ago today for enrolling at University of Alabama

The courage of the saints among us continue to inspire me and develop within me a grateful heart. It was 50 years ago today, on February 6, 1956 when I was 10 years old that Autherine Lucy was suspended from the University of Alabama after 3 days of riots during which the whites threatened to kill her. She had been enrolled on February 3 by court order. The King Chronologies from the King Center put it this way:

Autherine Lucy became the first black person to attend the University of Alabama on February 3rd. She was suspended on this day after three days of riots following her court-ordered enrollment. It is unclear why the University did not elect to suspend the rioters.

The United States has a shameful and very disturbing past which is something we should keep in mind when we insist on bringing our brand of freedom and democracy to other parts of the world at the points of our guns and missles.

For more information about Autherine Lucy and her life click on the link below.

Link: King Chronologies.